Недавно я рассказывал про "Синдикат-100" — сетку СМИ-иноагентов федерального и регионального уровней. Вот пример из практики.
В чатах, где родственники задержанных за участие в массовых беспорядках в Баймаке, собирают деньги на адвокатов и т.д., мобилизовались корреспонденты именно этих изданий.
Причём, как всегда, "большую" работу готовит "Новая газета" (иноагенты), остальные растаскивают баймакский кейс по маленьким кускам. Показательно, "наши" Пруфы.ру и Аспекты (бывшие Эхо-Москвы в Уфе) работают с ними в единой связке.
Недавно я рассказывал про "Синдикат-100" — сетку СМИ-иноагентов федерального и регионального уровней. Вот пример из практики.
В чатах, где родственники задержанных за участие в массовых беспорядках в Баймаке, собирают деньги на адвокатов и т.д., мобилизовались корреспонденты именно этих изданий.
Причём, как всегда, "большую" работу готовит "Новая газета" (иноагенты), остальные растаскивают баймакский кейс по маленьким кускам. Показательно, "наши" Пруфы.ру и Аспекты (бывшие Эхо-Москвы в Уфе) работают с ними в единой связке.
Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from us
