Банды джихадистов якобы едут по городу Хама, не встречая сопротивления: что происходит на самом деле?
▪️"Всё-таки Хаму не сдали. В южные районы города вошли подкрепления САА. Хотя, вероятно, остальную часть успели занять джихадисты и оппозиция", - пишет известный пропагандист боевиков и публикует видео с сирийскими танками
▪️Арабские каналы публикуют видео с колоннами террористов якобы в центре города
▪️Тем временем солдаты армии Сирии записывают видео, что якобы все нормалью и боевиков нет
Банды джихадистов якобы едут по городу Хама, не встречая сопротивления: что происходит на самом деле?
▪️"Всё-таки Хаму не сдали. В южные районы города вошли подкрепления САА. Хотя, вероятно, остальную часть успели занять джихадисты и оппозиция", - пишет известный пропагандист боевиков и публикует видео с сирийскими танками
▪️Арабские каналы публикуют видео с колоннами террористов якобы в центре города
▪️Тем временем солдаты армии Сирии записывают видео, что якобы все нормалью и боевиков нет
Russian President Vladimir Putin launched Russia's invasion of Ukraine in the early-morning hours of February 24, targeting several key cities with military strikes. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us