В новом санкционном списке США забанили «Газпромбанк».
И ещё многие другие банки, которые до сих пор не трогали: тот же «Дом.РФ».
Через «Газпромбанк» шли все расчёты при торговле нефтью и газом, он до последнего держался — но теперь всё. Делают всё, чтобы потом было сложнее откатывать назад.
К вопросу о том, что эскалация не только с нашей стороны.
В новом санкционном списке США забанили «Газпромбанк».
И ещё многие другие банки, которые до сих пор не трогали: тот же «Дом.РФ».
Через «Газпромбанк» шли все расчёты при торговле нефтью и газом, он до последнего держался — но теперь всё. Делают всё, чтобы потом было сложнее откатывать назад.
К вопросу о том, что эскалация не только с нашей стороны.
BY Роман Юнеман
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation."
from us
