Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
БЫСТРО
🚀🌰Миронов прокомментировал версию названия «Орешника» «Мне нравится версия, что орешник наряду с березой на Руси использовали как розги, чтобы наказывать тех, кто не слушается», - сказал депутат Госдумы РФ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚀💪Запуск «Орешника» позволил России «показать зубы», избежав при этом эскалации, пишет американский журнал The National Interest

Таким образом Москва продемонстрировала, что у нее есть ранее не известное миру оружие, и она готова его применить, отмечается в публикации.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM



group-telegram.com/bystronews/118816
Create:
Last Update:

🚀💪Запуск «Орешника» позволил России «показать зубы», избежав при этом эскалации, пишет американский журнал The National Interest

Таким образом Москва продемонстрировала, что у нее есть ранее не известное миру оружие, и она готова его применить, отмечается в публикации.

BY БЫСТРО


Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/bystronews/118816

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from us


Telegram БЫСТРО
FROM American