Today, Monday, our SDF forces repelled an attempted infiltration and attack by Turkish occupation mercenaries on the village of al-Alia, west of Tal Tamir town. Clashes erupted with the attacker mercenaries resulting in three mercenaries were eliminated, two others were wounded, and a military vehicle equipped with a DShk machine gun was destroyed. The Turkish occupation and its mercenaries are trying to ignite all fronts, in an attempt to relieve pressure on themselves in the fronts of the Tishreen Dam and Qara Qwzaq Bridge. The SDF remains vigilant and will resolutely respond to any aggression aimed at the security of northern and eastern Syria.
Today, Monday, our SDF forces repelled an attempted infiltration and attack by Turkish occupation mercenaries on the village of al-Alia, west of Tal Tamir town. Clashes erupted with the attacker mercenaries resulting in three mercenaries were eliminated, two others were wounded, and a military vehicle equipped with a DShk machine gun was destroyed. The Turkish occupation and its mercenaries are trying to ignite all fronts, in an attempt to relieve pressure on themselves in the fronts of the Tishreen Dam and Qara Qwzaq Bridge. The SDF remains vigilant and will resolutely respond to any aggression aimed at the security of northern and eastern Syria.
BY SDF_PRESS - المركز الإعلامي
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ca
