⚠️مشکل دیگری هم وجود دارد: بسیاری از ضدعفونی‌کننده‌ها روی کوروناویروس جدید کم‌اثر یا حتی بی‌اثرند.
بعضی ضدعفونی‌کننده‌ها را بسیاری از مردم اشتباه به‌کار می‌برند، مثلاً از الکل ٪۹۸ استفاده می‌کنند گمان می‌کنند قوی‌تر از الکل ٪۷۰ است!
بعضی مواد ضدعفونی‌کننده خارجی رویشان نوشته شده کوروناویروس را از بین می‌برند. منظورشان لزوماً کوروناویروسِ جدید نیست و باید از نظر دارا بودن مادۀ مؤثر و غلظت آن با منبع معتبر مانند مقالۀ زیر چک شوند:
⚠️مشکل دیگری هم وجود دارد: بسیاری از ضدعفونی‌کننده‌ها روی کوروناویروس جدید کم‌اثر یا حتی بی‌اثرند.
بعضی ضدعفونی‌کننده‌ها را بسیاری از مردم اشتباه به‌کار می‌برند، مثلاً از الکل ٪۹۸ استفاده می‌کنند گمان می‌کنند قوی‌تر از الکل ٪۷۰ است!
بعضی مواد ضدعفونی‌کننده خارجی رویشان نوشته شده کوروناویروس را از بین می‌برند. منظورشان لزوماً کوروناویروسِ جدید نیست و باید از نظر دارا بودن مادۀ مؤثر و غلظت آن با منبع معتبر مانند مقالۀ زیر چک شوند:
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects.
from cn
