Во временно оккупированном Харькове продолжается "добровольная" #моГилизация. Людолов сбил мужчину с движущегося велосипеда, и на место мгновенно подъехали два бусика с десятком "зеленых человечков". Мордовороты запаковали в машину и новую "жертву", и велосипед.
Во временно оккупированном Харькове продолжается "добровольная" #моГилизация. Людолов сбил мужчину с движущегося велосипеда, и на место мгновенно подъехали два бусика с десятком "зеленых человечков". Мордовороты запаковали в машину и новую "жертву", и велосипед.
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from us
