" والتحقيق: أنَّ صفاتِ الربِّ ــ جلَّ جلاله ــ داخلةٌ في مسمَّى اسمه، فليس اسمه «الله» و «الربُّ» و «الإله» أسماءً لذاتٍ مجرَّدةٍ لا صفةَ لها البتَّة، فإنَّ هذه الذات وجودُها يستحيل ، وإنَّما يفرضها الذِّهن فرضَ الممتنعات ثمَّ يحكم عليها.
واسم «الله» سبحانه و «الربِّ»، و «الإله» اسمٌ لذاتٍ لها جميعُ صفات الكمال ونعوت الجلال، كالعلم والقدرة والحياة والإرادة والكلام والسمع والبصر والبقاء والقِدَم، وسائرِ الكمال الذي يستحقُّه لذاته.
فصفاته داخلةٌ في مسمَّى اسمه، فتجريد الصِّفات عن الذات، والذات عن الصِّفات فرضٌ وخيالٌ ذهنيٌّ لا حقيقة له، وهو أمرٌ اعتباريٌّ لا فائدة فيه، ولا يترتَّب عليه معرفةٌ ولا إيمان، ولا هو علمٌ في نفسه.
وبهذا أجاب السَّلفُ الجهميَّةَ لمَّا استدلُّوا على خلق القرآن بقوله تعالى: {اللَّهُ خَالِقُ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ}، قالوا: والقرآن شيء؛
فأجابهم السَّلف بأنَّ القرآن كلامه، وكلامه صفته، وصفاته داخلةٌ في مسمَّى اسمه كعلمه وقدرته وحياته وسمعه وبصره ووجهه ويديه"
" والتحقيق: أنَّ صفاتِ الربِّ ــ جلَّ جلاله ــ داخلةٌ في مسمَّى اسمه، فليس اسمه «الله» و «الربُّ» و «الإله» أسماءً لذاتٍ مجرَّدةٍ لا صفةَ لها البتَّة، فإنَّ هذه الذات وجودُها يستحيل ، وإنَّما يفرضها الذِّهن فرضَ الممتنعات ثمَّ يحكم عليها.
واسم «الله» سبحانه و «الربِّ»، و «الإله» اسمٌ لذاتٍ لها جميعُ صفات الكمال ونعوت الجلال، كالعلم والقدرة والحياة والإرادة والكلام والسمع والبصر والبقاء والقِدَم، وسائرِ الكمال الذي يستحقُّه لذاته.
فصفاته داخلةٌ في مسمَّى اسمه، فتجريد الصِّفات عن الذات، والذات عن الصِّفات فرضٌ وخيالٌ ذهنيٌّ لا حقيقة له، وهو أمرٌ اعتباريٌّ لا فائدة فيه، ولا يترتَّب عليه معرفةٌ ولا إيمان، ولا هو علمٌ في نفسه.
وبهذا أجاب السَّلفُ الجهميَّةَ لمَّا استدلُّوا على خلق القرآن بقوله تعالى: {اللَّهُ خَالِقُ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ}، قالوا: والقرآن شيء؛
فأجابهم السَّلف بأنَّ القرآن كلامه، وكلامه صفته، وصفاته داخلةٌ في مسمَّى اسمه كعلمه وقدرته وحياته وسمعه وبصره ووجهه ويديه"
[ مدارج السالكين في منازل السائرين - ابن القيم ]
.
BY جليل زكرياء
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "We're seeing really dramatic moves, and it's all really tied to Ukraine right now, and in a secondary way, in terms of interest rates," Octavio Marenzi, CEO of Opimas, told Yahoo Finance Live on Thursday. "This war in Ukraine is going to give the Fed the ammunition, the cover that it needs, to not raise interest rates too quickly. And I think Jay Powell is a very tepid sort of inflation fighter and he's not going to do as much as he needs to do to get that under control. And this seems like an excuse to kick the can further down the road still and not do too much too soon." Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from de
