Ну, и кто после этого ещё скажет, что молодёжь у нас плохая, очень даже прекрасная, а это значит: будущее у нас есть, осталось только понять, как нынешнее руководство вообще дошло до церквей без крестов.
Ну, и кто после этого ещё скажет, что молодёжь у нас плохая, очень даже прекрасная, а это значит: будущее у нас есть, осталось только понять, как нынешнее руководство вообще дошло до церквей без крестов.
Креста на вас нет.
BY Донбасский Кейс
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever."
from us
