Эх люди-люди... Здесь лишь бы Стамбул 2.0 не родился. С нынешней ЛБС. Я в него не верю, ибо делать ещё несколько лет вид что мы в домике, и рассказывать что Шебекино и Тёткино не обещали, и там живут ленивые аграрии с пивком на диванах, не выйдет, но житейский опыт есть житейский опыт. И я знаю сколько в среднем эшелоне готовы ради достатка и комфорта на что угодно #мысли
Эх люди-люди... Здесь лишь бы Стамбул 2.0 не родился. С нынешней ЛБС. Я в него не верю, ибо делать ещё несколько лет вид что мы в домике, и рассказывать что Шебекино и Тёткино не обещали, и там живут ленивые аграрии с пивком на диванах, не выйдет, но житейский опыт есть житейский опыт. И я знаю сколько в среднем эшелоне готовы ради достатка и комфорта на что угодно #мысли
In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from us
