Верховный суд РФ отклонил первый иск политика, оспаривающего требования ЦИК к сбору подписей для регистрации кандидатом на выборах президента России.
Надеждин оспаривает требование ЦИК к тому, чтобы сбор подписей граждан могли вести только те сборщики, которые были зарегистрированы в регионе прописки подписантов.
Верховный суд РФ отклонил первый иск политика, оспаривающего требования ЦИК к сбору подписей для регистрации кандидатом на выборах президента России.
Надеждин оспаривает требование ЦИК к тому, чтобы сбор подписей граждан могли вести только те сборщики, которые были зарегистрированы в регионе прописки подписантов.
On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "The inflation fire was already hot and now with war-driven inflation added to the mix, it will grow even hotter, setting off a scramble by the world’s central banks to pull back their stimulus earlier than expected," Chris Rupkey, chief economist at FWDBONDS, wrote in an email. "A spike in inflation rates has preceded economic recessions historically and this time prices have soared to levels that once again pose a threat to growth." In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. The SC urges the public to refer to the SC’s I nvestor Alert List before investing. The list contains details of unauthorised websites, investment products, companies and individuals. Members of the public who suspect that they have been approached by unauthorised firms or individuals offering schemes that promise unrealistic returns
from us
