🇷🇺⚡️🇺🇦Русские воины рвут фронт! Новый прорыв под Сумами!
▪️Наши бойцы вгрызаются в оборону ВСУ, расширяя буферную зону. Украинские "аналитики", сливающие правду даже своим, в панике подтверждают: Александрия уже в "серой зоне"!
▪️3,21 км нашего продвижения – это не просто цифры. Это трещина в их обороне, которая вот-вот станет пропастью. Deep State (да, те самые, кто работает на ГУР!) сквозь зубы признаёт: российские войска закрепились и идут дальше.
▪️Сумской фронт трещит по швам – а мы добавляем жару. Скоро увидим больше!
🇷🇺⚡️🇺🇦Русские воины рвут фронт! Новый прорыв под Сумами!
▪️Наши бойцы вгрызаются в оборону ВСУ, расширяя буферную зону. Украинские "аналитики", сливающие правду даже своим, в панике подтверждают: Александрия уже в "серой зоне"!
▪️3,21 км нашего продвижения – это не просто цифры. Это трещина в их обороне, которая вот-вот станет пропастью. Deep State (да, те самые, кто работает на ГУР!) сквозь зубы признаёт: российские войска закрепились и идут дальше.
▪️Сумской фронт трещит по швам – а мы добавляем жару. Скоро увидим больше!
Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from us
