We are raising a fund to appeal Igor Paskar’s sentence
On 31 May the Southern District military court sentenced Igor Paskar to eight-and-a-half years’ imprisonment, on charges of "terrorism" and "vandalism". That was how the court judged symbolically throwing a Molotov cocktail at a federal security services (FSB) building, and setting light to a Z-banner (a pro-war symbol) in Krasnodar. Igor undertook both of these actions to protest against the war: when he took the action at the FSB building, he painted the colours of the Ukrainian flag on his cheek.
The court defined Paskar’s action at the FSB building as an "act of terrorism", and ruled that the action had terrorised the population and posed a threat to people’s safety. The video recording of the action should be enough to convince you that it did no such thing.
Neither Igor Paskar nor his defence lawyer consider the sentence he has received to be justified.
We are raising a fund of €2400, to pay lawyers’ fees to appeal the sentence, and for transport expenses to Moscow for the appeal hearing.
Support our appeal, by making donations and reposts!
🪙PayPal:[email protected] (marked "for Paskar", please indicate the currency in euro if possible)
🥷 Cryptocurrency (be sure to email us at [email protected] if you are transferring cryptocurrency to support Igor Paskar):
We are raising a fund to appeal Igor Paskar’s sentence
On 31 May the Southern District military court sentenced Igor Paskar to eight-and-a-half years’ imprisonment, on charges of "terrorism" and "vandalism". That was how the court judged symbolically throwing a Molotov cocktail at a federal security services (FSB) building, and setting light to a Z-banner (a pro-war symbol) in Krasnodar. Igor undertook both of these actions to protest against the war: when he took the action at the FSB building, he painted the colours of the Ukrainian flag on his cheek.
The court defined Paskar’s action at the FSB building as an "act of terrorism", and ruled that the action had terrorised the population and posed a threat to people’s safety. The video recording of the action should be enough to convince you that it did no such thing.
Neither Igor Paskar nor his defence lawyer consider the sentence he has received to be justified.
We are raising a fund of €2400, to pay lawyers’ fees to appeal the sentence, and for transport expenses to Moscow for the appeal hearing.
Support our appeal, by making donations and reposts!
🪙PayPal:[email protected] (marked "for Paskar", please indicate the currency in euro if possible)
🥷 Cryptocurrency (be sure to email us at [email protected] if you are transferring cryptocurrency to support Igor Paskar):
"We're seeing really dramatic moves, and it's all really tied to Ukraine right now, and in a secondary way, in terms of interest rates," Octavio Marenzi, CEO of Opimas, told Yahoo Finance Live on Thursday. "This war in Ukraine is going to give the Fed the ammunition, the cover that it needs, to not raise interest rates too quickly. And I think Jay Powell is a very tepid sort of inflation fighter and he's not going to do as much as he needs to do to get that under control. And this seems like an excuse to kick the can further down the road still and not do too much too soon." In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from id
