We are raising a fund to appeal Igor Paskar’s sentence
On 31 May the Southern District military court sentenced Igor Paskar to eight-and-a-half years’ imprisonment, on charges of "terrorism" and "vandalism". That was how the court judged symbolically throwing a Molotov cocktail at a federal security services (FSB) building, and setting light to a Z-banner (a pro-war symbol) in Krasnodar. Igor undertook both of these actions to protest against the war: when he took the action at the FSB building, he painted the colours of the Ukrainian flag on his cheek.
The court defined Paskar’s action at the FSB building as an "act of terrorism", and ruled that the action had terrorised the population and posed a threat to people’s safety. The video recording of the action should be enough to convince you that it did no such thing.
Neither Igor Paskar nor his defence lawyer consider the sentence he has received to be justified.
We are raising a fund of €2400, to pay lawyers’ fees to appeal the sentence, and for transport expenses to Moscow for the appeal hearing.
Support our appeal, by making donations and reposts!
🪙PayPal:[email protected] (marked "for Paskar", please indicate the currency in euro if possible)
🥷 Cryptocurrency (be sure to email us at [email protected] if you are transferring cryptocurrency to support Igor Paskar):
We are raising a fund to appeal Igor Paskar’s sentence
On 31 May the Southern District military court sentenced Igor Paskar to eight-and-a-half years’ imprisonment, on charges of "terrorism" and "vandalism". That was how the court judged symbolically throwing a Molotov cocktail at a federal security services (FSB) building, and setting light to a Z-banner (a pro-war symbol) in Krasnodar. Igor undertook both of these actions to protest against the war: when he took the action at the FSB building, he painted the colours of the Ukrainian flag on his cheek.
The court defined Paskar’s action at the FSB building as an "act of terrorism", and ruled that the action had terrorised the population and posed a threat to people’s safety. The video recording of the action should be enough to convince you that it did no such thing.
Neither Igor Paskar nor his defence lawyer consider the sentence he has received to be justified.
We are raising a fund of €2400, to pay lawyers’ fees to appeal the sentence, and for transport expenses to Moscow for the appeal hearing.
Support our appeal, by making donations and reposts!
🪙PayPal:[email protected] (marked "for Paskar", please indicate the currency in euro if possible)
🥷 Cryptocurrency (be sure to email us at [email protected] if you are transferring cryptocurrency to support Igor Paskar):
That hurt tech stocks. For the past few weeks, the 10-year yield has traded between 1.72% and 2%, as traders moved into the bond for safety when Russia headlines were ugly—and out of it when headlines improved. Now, the yield is touching its pandemic-era high. If the yield breaks above that level, that could signal that it’s on a sustainable path higher. Higher long-dated bond yields make future profits less valuable—and many tech companies are valued on the basis of profits forecast for many years in the future. The SC urges the public to refer to the SC’s I nvestor Alert List before investing. The list contains details of unauthorised websites, investment products, companies and individuals. Members of the public who suspect that they have been approached by unauthorised firms or individuals offering schemes that promise unrealistic returns If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market.
from us
