Появилась информация, что на 80-летие освобождения Освенцима в Польше не пригласили ни представителей России ни премьер-министра Израиля Нетаньяху, которого польские власти угрожают арестовать в случае приезда.
Таким образом, не будет ни тех, кто концлагерь освобождал, ни тех кого освобождали. Зато сообщается, что должны присутствовать президент Палестинской национальной администрации Махмуд Аббас и канцлер Германии Олаф Шольц.
Появилась информация, что на 80-летие освобождения Освенцима в Польше не пригласили ни представителей России ни премьер-министра Израиля Нетаньяху, которого польские власти угрожают арестовать в случае приезда.
Таким образом, не будет ни тех, кто концлагерь освобождал, ни тех кого освобождали. Зато сообщается, что должны присутствовать президент Палестинской национальной администрации Махмуд Аббас и канцлер Германии Олаф Шольц.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram users are able to send files of any type up to 2GB each and access them from any device, with no limit on cloud storage, which has made downloading files more popular on the platform. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "Russians are really disconnected from the reality of what happening to their country," Andrey said. "So Telegram has become essential for understanding what's going on to the Russian-speaking world."
from us
