🔴 این سؤال رو زیاد می‌پرسند. آیا غیر از خرید بلیت و ترک حوزۀ شنگن، بهتره کاری بکنند؟ (مثلاً ای‌میل به سفارت؟) اگر پاسخ مطمئنی دارید لطفاً بفرمایید تا همین‌جا به اطلاع دوستان برسه: @keikojaberim
🔴 این سؤال رو زیاد می‌پرسند. آیا غیر از خرید بلیت و ترک حوزۀ شنگن، بهتره کاری بکنند؟ (مثلاً ای‌میل به سفارت؟) اگر پاسخ مطمئنی دارید لطفاً بفرمایید تا همین‌جا به اطلاع دوستان برسه: @keikojaberim
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news.
from us
