Документальный фильм о работе городских служб столицы по восстановлению инфраструктуры Луганска и Донецка вышел в эфир телеканала «Россия 24»
Инженеры, энергетики, газовики, дорожники, сварщики, электрики, водители, специалисты других профессий – иногда в сложнейших условиях – делают всё возможное, чтобы жизнь соотечественников стала комфортнее.
Смотрите фильмпо ссылкеили в эфире телеканала «Россия 24» в воскресенье, 1 декабря, в 10:28 и 18:29.
Документальный фильм о работе городских служб столицы по восстановлению инфраструктуры Луганска и Донецка вышел в эфир телеканала «Россия 24»
Инженеры, энергетики, газовики, дорожники, сварщики, электрики, водители, специалисты других профессий – иногда в сложнейших условиях – делают всё возможное, чтобы жизнь соотечественников стала комфортнее.
Смотрите фильмпо ссылкеили в эфире телеканала «Россия 24» в воскресенье, 1 декабря, в 10:28 и 18:29.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough
from us
