В операциях с землей, которые вменяют в вину экс-мэру Сочи, участвовали врач и учитель
«Ъ» стали известны детали уголовного дела бывшего мэра Сочи. По версии МВД, причиной операций с земельными участками, которые легли в основу предъявленного экс-чиновнику обвинения в присвоении (ч. 4 ст. 160 УК РФ) на сумму более 3,7 млн руб., стало желание Алексея Копайгородского расширить границы владения своего дома, расположенного в Хостинском районе города-курорта.
Фото: Пресс-служба московских судов общей юрисдикции
В операциях с землей, которые вменяют в вину экс-мэру Сочи, участвовали врач и учитель
«Ъ» стали известны детали уголовного дела бывшего мэра Сочи. По версии МВД, причиной операций с земельными участками, которые легли в основу предъявленного экс-чиновнику обвинения в присвоении (ч. 4 ст. 160 УК РФ) на сумму более 3,7 млн руб., стало желание Алексея Копайгородского расширить границы владения своего дома, расположенного в Хостинском районе города-курорта.
Фото: Пресс-служба московских судов общей юрисдикции
On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
