Присутствие войск НАТО на Украине не противоречит международному праву. С точки зрения международного права и Устава ООН ничто бы не мешало войскам стран-членов НАТО, так же, как и гражданским, помогать в работе на Украине. При этом должно быть четкое разграничение между развертыванием боевых войск и возможным привлечением войск к определенной «вспомогательной» деятельности.
Присутствие войск НАТО на Украине не противоречит международному праву. С точки зрения международного права и Устава ООН ничто бы не мешало войскам стран-членов НАТО, так же, как и гражданским, помогать в работе на Украине. При этом должно быть четкое разграничение между развертыванием боевых войск и возможным привлечением войск к определенной «вспомогательной» деятельности.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. During the operations, Sebi officials seized various records and documents, including 34 mobile phones, six laptops, four desktops, four tablets, two hard drive disks and one pen drive from the custody of these persons. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours.
from us
