Первый коллаж по «Письмам к Безымянной» 💔 🎶 Я начинаю этот путь заново, готовая вновь разлететься на осколки, но меня тянет туда. Особенно после того как зацвели маки /скоро принесу кое-что/. 🎶 И протягиваю руку вам, если вы уже прошли путь композитора и его Безымянной или же только собираетесь✨ 🎶 #зарисовки_bo
Первый коллаж по «Письмам к Безымянной» 💔 🎶 Я начинаю этот путь заново, готовая вновь разлететься на осколки, но меня тянет туда. Особенно после того как зацвели маки /скоро принесу кое-что/. 🎶 И протягиваю руку вам, если вы уже прошли путь композитора и его Безымянной или же только собираетесь✨ 🎶 #зарисовки_bo
"He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised.
from us
