Заработали: - 28 адресов более $10m - 424 адреса от $1m до $10m - 16,791 адрес от $10k до $1m - 50,636 адресов от $1k до $10k - 259,429 адресов от $0 до $1k
Потеряли: - 33 адреса более $10m - 367 адресов от $1m до $10m - 16,571 адрес от $10k до $1m - 65,763 адреса от $1k до $10k - 486,421 адресот $0 до $1k
Заработали: - 28 адресов более $10m - 424 адреса от $1m до $10m - 16,791 адрес от $10k до $1m - 50,636 адресов от $1k до $10k - 259,429 адресов от $0 до $1k
Потеряли: - 33 адреса более $10m - 367 адресов от $1m до $10m - 16,571 адрес от $10k до $1m - 65,763 адреса от $1k до $10k - 486,421 адресот $0 до $1k
Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. In addition, Telegram now supports the use of third-party streaming tools like OBS Studio and XSplit to broadcast live video, allowing users to add overlays and multi-screen layouts for a more professional look. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford.
from us
