Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Это не особенно примечательное промышленное здание в английском Шрусбери, построенное в 1796-1797 гг. по проекту Чарльза Бейджа в качестве льняной мануфактуры, а позднее использовавшееся в роли солодовни, на самом деле имеет две важные архитектурные особенности. Именно поэтому в январе 1953 г. английские власти, внезапно осознав значимость этого архитектурного объекта, внесли его в число охраняемых построек, а два года назад здание подверглось полной реновации.

Первая особенность связана с материалом, из которого собраны внешние несущие стены: в связи с ростом популярности кирпича в качестве строительного материала в 1784 г. Георг III, казна которого стремительно оскудевала из-за войны за независимость американских колоний, ввел налог на кирпичи. Первоначально размер налога составлял 2 шиллинга и 6 пенсов за тысячу кирпичей, а в 1794 г. и 1797 г. был поднят до 4 и 5 шиллингов соответственно. Производители тут же отреагировали на эту меру увеличением размера кирпича, и здание льняной мануфактуры, построенное из более крупного кирпича, является таким образом примером успешного использования этой лазейки, которую власти ликвидировали только в 1801 г., прописав в законе конкретные размеры изделия и вдвое увеличив налоговую ставку на более крупный кирпич.

По пятничной традиции предлагаем вам внимательно рассмотреть это здание и ответить, какой еще отличительной особенностью обладает этот проект, крайне важной для истории модернизма и обеспечившей зданию государственную защиту?

———

Seemingly unremarkable, this industrial building erected in Shrewsbury, UK, in 1796-1797 to the designs of Charles Bage to function as a flax mill and later as maltings boasts at least two architectural features that make it an important landmark and a reason why it was listed as a Grade I building in January, 1953 and given a new life a couple of years ago following a complete overhaul.

The first prominent feature has to do with the material used for the outer walls. The thing is that the growing significance of bricks as a construction material as well as the ever-increasing expenditures of the crown to fund the war against American colonies prompted King George III to levy a new tax in 1784, the brick tax. Bricks were initially taxed at 2s 6d per thousand and the tax was increased in 1794 and 1797 to 4s and 5s, respectively. Brick manufacturers were swift in responding to this fiscal move by making bricks to a larger dimension. The flax mill building constructed of larger bricks is thus an example of this loophole, which was closed only in 1801 when the government limited the dimensions of a brick and doubled the tax on bricks that were larger.

As it’s time for a Friday night quiz, anyone willing is welcome to take a closer look at the building and guess the other remarkable feature of its architecture that made it an important precursor of modernism and earned the mill the Grade I listing.

(photos: Daniel Hopkinson, Feiden Clegg Bradley Studios, ribaj.com, archdaily.com, architectsjournal.co.uk, flaxmillshrewsbury.wordpress.com, barbararainford.co.uk, tishfarrell.com, traveltalk.me.uk, historicengland.org.uk, shrewsburyflaxmillmaltings.org.uk)



group-telegram.com/midcenturymodern/16879
Create:
Last Update:

Это не особенно примечательное промышленное здание в английском Шрусбери, построенное в 1796-1797 гг. по проекту Чарльза Бейджа в качестве льняной мануфактуры, а позднее использовавшееся в роли солодовни, на самом деле имеет две важные архитектурные особенности. Именно поэтому в январе 1953 г. английские власти, внезапно осознав значимость этого архитектурного объекта, внесли его в число охраняемых построек, а два года назад здание подверглось полной реновации.

Первая особенность связана с материалом, из которого собраны внешние несущие стены: в связи с ростом популярности кирпича в качестве строительного материала в 1784 г. Георг III, казна которого стремительно оскудевала из-за войны за независимость американских колоний, ввел налог на кирпичи. Первоначально размер налога составлял 2 шиллинга и 6 пенсов за тысячу кирпичей, а в 1794 г. и 1797 г. был поднят до 4 и 5 шиллингов соответственно. Производители тут же отреагировали на эту меру увеличением размера кирпича, и здание льняной мануфактуры, построенное из более крупного кирпича, является таким образом примером успешного использования этой лазейки, которую власти ликвидировали только в 1801 г., прописав в законе конкретные размеры изделия и вдвое увеличив налоговую ставку на более крупный кирпич.

По пятничной традиции предлагаем вам внимательно рассмотреть это здание и ответить, какой еще отличительной особенностью обладает этот проект, крайне важной для истории модернизма и обеспечившей зданию государственную защиту?

———

Seemingly unremarkable, this industrial building erected in Shrewsbury, UK, in 1796-1797 to the designs of Charles Bage to function as a flax mill and later as maltings boasts at least two architectural features that make it an important landmark and a reason why it was listed as a Grade I building in January, 1953 and given a new life a couple of years ago following a complete overhaul.

The first prominent feature has to do with the material used for the outer walls. The thing is that the growing significance of bricks as a construction material as well as the ever-increasing expenditures of the crown to fund the war against American colonies prompted King George III to levy a new tax in 1784, the brick tax. Bricks were initially taxed at 2s 6d per thousand and the tax was increased in 1794 and 1797 to 4s and 5s, respectively. Brick manufacturers were swift in responding to this fiscal move by making bricks to a larger dimension. The flax mill building constructed of larger bricks is thus an example of this loophole, which was closed only in 1801 when the government limited the dimensions of a brick and doubled the tax on bricks that were larger.

As it’s time for a Friday night quiz, anyone willing is welcome to take a closer look at the building and guess the other remarkable feature of its architecture that made it an important precursor of modernism and earned the mill the Grade I listing.

(photos: Daniel Hopkinson, Feiden Clegg Bradley Studios, ribaj.com, archdaily.com, architectsjournal.co.uk, flaxmillshrewsbury.wordpress.com, barbararainford.co.uk, tishfarrell.com, traveltalk.me.uk, historicengland.org.uk, shrewsburyflaxmillmaltings.org.uk)

BY Mid-Century, More Than













Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/midcenturymodern/16879

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Elsewhere, version 8.6 of Telegram integrates the in-app camera option into the gallery, while a new navigation bar gives quick access to photos, files, location sharing, and more. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from us


Telegram Mid-Century, More Than
FROM American