библейский Змей это прежде всего символ и страж границ райского сада, который, в свою очередь, прототип храмового сада, обладавшего статусом спасительного укрытия
единственное условие доступа в райский сад - победа в поединке с его стражем
то есть, легенда об искушении и последующем изгнании из райского сада - зеркальная инверсия ритуала инициации
библейский Змей это прежде всего символ и страж границ райского сада, который, в свою очередь, прототип храмового сада, обладавшего статусом спасительного укрытия
единственное условие доступа в райский сад - победа в поединке с его стражем
то есть, легенда об искушении и последующем изгнании из райского сада - зеркальная инверсия ритуала инициации
BY Мир Фольги
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. "This time we received the coordinates of enemy vehicles marked 'V' in Kyiv region," it added. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from us
