В Горно-Алтайске наряд полиции вызвали по адресу из-за с дебоша.
Компания мужиков, как сказано в пресс-службе МВД, нарушала общественный порядок. А когда приехали силовики, один из дебоширов отказался повиноваться полиции и начал кусаться.
Теперь в отношение зубастика возбуждено дело о причинении насилия к сотруднику полиции.
В Горно-Алтайске наряд полиции вызвали по адресу из-за с дебоша.
Компания мужиков, как сказано в пресс-службе МВД, нарушала общественный порядок. А когда приехали силовики, один из дебоширов отказался повиноваться полиции и начал кусаться.
Теперь в отношение зубастика возбуждено дело о причинении насилия к сотруднику полиции.
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from us
