🔴 Evidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfection After Recovery from Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019 OUP 21 November 2020
#Reinfection with a genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 strain may occur in an immunocompetent patient ⚠️shortly after recovery from mild COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection may not confer immunity against a different SARS-CoV-2 strain.
The viral RNA of positive retest was clustered into a subgroup distinct from that of the initial infection, suggesting that there was a reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 with a subtype that was 👉different from that of the primary strain.
On day 15 of hospitalization (25 March 2020), the patient’s symptoms had nearly disappeared. The patient tested negative via PCR on 26 and 27 March and was discharged home on 30 March. 🚨Six days after discharge (5 April 2020) the patient reported aggravation of cough combined with sputum. A day later, the upper respiratory specimens retested positive. 🟣 دربارۀ کووید-۱۹: 🆘@nouritazeh
🔴 Evidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfection After Recovery from Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019 OUP 21 November 2020
#Reinfection with a genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 strain may occur in an immunocompetent patient ⚠️shortly after recovery from mild COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection may not confer immunity against a different SARS-CoV-2 strain.
The viral RNA of positive retest was clustered into a subgroup distinct from that of the initial infection, suggesting that there was a reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 with a subtype that was 👉different from that of the primary strain.
On day 15 of hospitalization (25 March 2020), the patient’s symptoms had nearly disappeared. The patient tested negative via PCR on 26 and 27 March and was discharged home on 30 March. 🚨Six days after discharge (5 April 2020) the patient reported aggravation of cough combined with sputum. A day later, the upper respiratory specimens retested positive. 🟣 دربارۀ کووید-۱۹: 🆘@nouritazeh
BY پیشگیری از همهگیری بیماریهای واگیردار
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. WhatsApp, a rival messaging platform, introduced some measures to counter disinformation when Covid-19 was first sweeping the world. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from nl
