🔴 Evidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfection After Recovery from Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019 OUP 21 November 2020
#Reinfection with a genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 strain may occur in an immunocompetent patient ⚠️shortly after recovery from mild COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection may not confer immunity against a different SARS-CoV-2 strain.
The viral RNA of positive retest was clustered into a subgroup distinct from that of the initial infection, suggesting that there was a reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 with a subtype that was 👉different from that of the primary strain.
On day 15 of hospitalization (25 March 2020), the patient’s symptoms had nearly disappeared. The patient tested negative via PCR on 26 and 27 March and was discharged home on 30 March. 🚨Six days after discharge (5 April 2020) the patient reported aggravation of cough combined with sputum. A day later, the upper respiratory specimens retested positive. 🟣 دربارۀ کووید-۱۹: 🆘@nouritazeh
🔴 Evidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfection After Recovery from Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019 OUP 21 November 2020
#Reinfection with a genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 strain may occur in an immunocompetent patient ⚠️shortly after recovery from mild COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection may not confer immunity against a different SARS-CoV-2 strain.
The viral RNA of positive retest was clustered into a subgroup distinct from that of the initial infection, suggesting that there was a reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 with a subtype that was 👉different from that of the primary strain.
On day 15 of hospitalization (25 March 2020), the patient’s symptoms had nearly disappeared. The patient tested negative via PCR on 26 and 27 March and was discharged home on 30 March. 🚨Six days after discharge (5 April 2020) the patient reported aggravation of cough combined with sputum. A day later, the upper respiratory specimens retested positive. 🟣 دربارۀ کووید-۱۹: 🆘@nouritazeh
BY پیشگیری از همهگیری بیماریهای واگیردار
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from us
