Да анализирамо синоћњу изјаву Хер Шмитлера ( Кристијана Шмита) за муслиманске медије, па каже:
➡️ Хвала вам јер сте опредјељени да осигурате владавину права. ‼️Лик се лажно представља, без легимитета Савјета безбједности у страној држави, суспендује устав, намеће закон путем одлука мимо законодавне процедуре и без надлежности за то.✅ ( остатак текста у коментару објаве)
Да анализирамо синоћњу изјаву Хер Шмитлера ( Кристијана Шмита) за муслиманске медије, па каже:
➡️ Хвала вам јер сте опредјељени да осигурате владавину права. ‼️Лик се лажно представља, без легимитета Савјета безбједности у страној држави, суспендује устав, намеће закон путем одлука мимо законодавне процедуре и без надлежности за то.✅ ( остатак текста у коментару објаве)
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. "Russians are really disconnected from the reality of what happening to their country," Andrey said. "So Telegram has become essential for understanding what's going on to the Russian-speaking world." Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change.
from us
