"In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.”
~ Galileo

My take on the demonic realm and their relationship with AI and supercomputers.

While demons can interfere directly with electronic equipment, they are not infinite like God but finite, therefore they cannot directly control the entire AI-controlled supercomputer system. They can only mess with the system on a relatively limited basis. They will definitely control the entire supercomputer system indirectly by perversely inspiring those who design it and those who operate it, as well as perversely inspiring the atheistic principles that will dominate the world in the last days.

Unbelief is not lack of information. Unbelief is rejection of information.

Unbelief is Satan walking out of God's glorious presence. It is Eve trading the plain statement of God for a subtle misrepresentation of God. It is Israel grumbling at Moses though they themselves heard God's voice. It is the Pharisees rejecting the unmistakable signs of the Messiah. It is men today rejecting what they know, in their heart of hearts, is truth. No man will be able to plea ignorance at the Great White Throne, not even those that lived in the darkest aboriginal circumstances. They all have the testimony of nature and their own conscience. No man is without sufficient witness.

The degree of emphasis that the Bible gives a subject and the explicitness of those references are very different questions than whether the subject is true. There is no direct relationship between emphasis and truth or explicitness and truth. The Trinity received no direct teaching in the OT and only a few relatively vague hints, yet the pre-Yeshua rabbis rightly deduced the Trinity from the Scriptures. Truth is truth, even if it receives minor emphasis. Truth is truth, even if the passages only imply and don't explicitly state the point. When men press lack of emphasis or lack of explicitness against a biblical truth, they are arguing rhetorically not exegetically. They are employing ad hominem arguments not hermeneutical arguments.

Law vs. Grace

The Law is perfect:
that is why imperfect men cannot keep it.

The Law is holy:
that is why sinners are condemned by it.

The Law is just:
therefore it cannot show mercy to the guilty.

The Law prohibits;
Grace invites and gives.

The Law condemns the sinner;
Grace redeems the sinner.

The Law reveals sin;
Grace atones for sin.

By the Law is the knowledge of sin;
by Grace is redemption from sin.

The Law was given by Moses;
Grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.

The Law demands obedience;
Grace bestows and gives power to obey.

The Law says do and do not;
Grace says "it is done."

The Law says "continue to be holy";
Grace says "it is finished."

The Law curses;
Grace blesses.

The law slays the sinner;
Grace makes the sinner alive.

The Law shuts every mouth before God;
Grace opens the mouth to praise God.

The Law condemns the best man;
Grace saves the worst man.

The Law says, pay what you owe;
Grace says I freely forgive you all.

The Law says "the wages of sin is death";
Grace says "the gift of God is eternal life."

The Law says "the soul that sinneth it shall die";
Grace says Believe and live.

The Law was done away in Christ;
Grace abides forever.

The Law puts us under bondage;
Grace sets us in the liberty of the sons of God (Rom 12:1)

~ Chuck Missler

When I talk about prophecy

I cannot spell! 😉 Boldy…Boldly!
https://youtube.com/shorts/Bej7-nUAktQ?si=5vdE80_7uE2eXgVo

I love the KJV. It has been my primary English Bible for over 35 years. It has stood the test of time. It is the Bible of two revivals, many awakenings, the great missionary movement, and the first 160 years of the modern prophecy movement. It is the Bible of the great hymns and many great commentaries. But it is not inerrant in its text and translation. Psalm 119:89 "For ever, O Lord, thy word is settled in heaven" does not prove that the KJV is laid up in heaven as the standard. It proves that the original Greek and Hebrew is laid up in heaven as the standard.

A few principles for interpreting Scripture.

1) No verse can actually contradict another. If you think they contradict, you misunderstand one or both verses.

2) No verse can be understood as an island, unrelated to its context and other passages which touch on the same subject.

3) No word can be assigned a sense which didn't exist in the NT era. The NT vocabulary is Koine Greek used in senses familiar to Koine speakers. NT words can and do take common senses and elevate them (from man-centric to God-centric, earthly to heavenly, temporal to eternal, etc.), but the NT contains no words used in a unique, non-Koine sense.

Live tomorrow night at 7:30pm CST ~ See you then!

https://www.youtube.com/live/738gMJxoqx4?si=mEIbQg0juxVvnwZ_

The almost universal circular reasoning of the post-tribbers. I get hit with this several times a week.

POSTIE — Nobody taught a pretrib rapture until Darby.
ME — Here is a pretrib passage from Ephraim the Syrian.
POSTIE — Why are you citing a mere human being? Who cares what the Fathers taught. Show me a pretrib verse in the Bible!
ME — How about Rev. 3:10 or John 14:1-3?
POSTIE — No early father understood those verses that way.

This kind of circular reasoning is dishonest, but error must jump from point to point to avoid defeat. If it stands still on one point, it will get crushed.