Зачем было устраивать СВО, чтобы защищать права русскоязычного населения Украины, когда не можешь соблюсти конституционные права россиянина в России. Пусть и туповатого и совершившего мерзкий и идиотский поступок. Вопрос конечно риторический. Согласны с Ксенией Анатольевной, хоть в этом.
Зачем было устраивать СВО, чтобы защищать права русскоязычного населения Украины, когда не можешь соблюсти конституционные права россиянина в России. Пусть и туповатого и совершившего мерзкий и идиотский поступок. Вопрос конечно риторический. Согласны с Ксенией Анатольевной, хоть в этом.
BY Образ будущего
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In addition, Telegram now supports the use of third-party streaming tools like OBS Studio and XSplit to broadcast live video, allowing users to add overlays and multi-screen layouts for a more professional look. Also in the latest update is the ability for users to create a unique @username from the Settings page, providing others with an easy way to contact them via Search or their t.me/username link without sharing their phone number. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers.
from us
