🤡 "Ни цирк, ни лунопарк к нам не едет. На поле по ул. Московской течёт вонючая жижа уже неизвестно сколько месяцев. Полгода точно, а то и больше. Наступишь - не отмоешься. Кстати, можно это место назвать Каменской долиной гейзеров, так там до сих пор колосится зелёная трава и присутствует явных запах сероводорода", – возмущается подписчик ПвК.
🤡 "Ни цирк, ни лунопарк к нам не едет. На поле по ул. Московской течёт вонючая жижа уже неизвестно сколько месяцев. Полгода точно, а то и больше. Наступишь - не отмоешься. Кстати, можно это место назвать Каменской долиной гейзеров, так там до сих пор колосится зелёная трава и присутствует явных запах сероводорода", – возмущается подписчик ПвК.
The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup.
from us
