прислонясь к асфальту головой он услышал рокот под землёй сердце мира, розу, шум воды на поверхности свои следы и тропинку вверх, и лес внизу с моря средиземного грозу нитки нотки лодки рыбаков сети ли колодки для быков
прислонясь к асфальту головой он услышал рокот под землёй сердце мира, розу, шум воды на поверхности свои следы и тропинку вверх, и лес внизу с моря средиземного грозу нитки нотки лодки рыбаков сети ли колодки для быков
#мария_ежова
BY ποίησις as is | поэзис как есть
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
