переворствовал один зин и подумал, а прикольно будет сделать книгу про старые флаеры российской клубной сцены 80-2000е, и нашел небольшой архив и получилась такая штука, где подразумевается перевод каждого флаера и есть небольшие комментарии тех кто это все застал + рассказ о самих клубах и кто там существовал и играл и тп
переворствовал один зин и подумал, а прикольно будет сделать книгу про старые флаеры российской клубной сцены 80-2000е, и нашел небольшой архив и получилась такая штука, где подразумевается перевод каждого флаера и есть небольшие комментарии тех кто это все застал + рассказ о самих клубах и кто там существовал и играл и тп
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information.
from us
