Сижу на лекции. Докладчик – молодой батюшка, рассказывает о просветительской деятельности на приходе. У них на территории храма есть кафе, куда может прийти любой желающий. Храм в Москве, почти в центре. Как-то перед Пасхой, в Великую Субботу, для освящения куличей и яиц к ним неожиданно приехал Патриарх. Всё было хорошо, все были рады, даже кофе угостили, и кофе понравился. Вопрос из зала: "С молоком?". Когда громко смеются почти сто батюшек, это сила.
Сижу на лекции. Докладчик – молодой батюшка, рассказывает о просветительской деятельности на приходе. У них на территории храма есть кафе, куда может прийти любой желающий. Храм в Москве, почти в центре. Как-то перед Пасхой, в Великую Субботу, для освящения куличей и яиц к ним неожиданно приехал Патриарх. Всё было хорошо, все были рады, даже кофе угостили, и кофе понравился. Вопрос из зала: "С молоком?". Когда громко смеются почти сто батюшек, это сила.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford.
from us
