Was für ein Irrenhaus! Jene, die versucht haben, die AfD-Delegierten in Riesa an der Ausübung ihrer demokratischen Rechte (und Pflichten) zu hindern, beklagen sich jetzt darüber, dass ihr versuchter Gesetzesbruch gestört wurde. Diese Menschen leben in ihrer eigenen, parallelen Realität.
Kommentar dazu auf X: "Erste Überlebende berichten aus der Kesselschlacht von Riesa: Eine ganze Generation traumatisiert. 0 Grad und keine Toiletten. Das ist Polizeigewalt." @ ozizzus
Was für ein Irrenhaus! Jene, die versucht haben, die AfD-Delegierten in Riesa an der Ausübung ihrer demokratischen Rechte (und Pflichten) zu hindern, beklagen sich jetzt darüber, dass ihr versuchter Gesetzesbruch gestört wurde. Diese Menschen leben in ihrer eigenen, parallelen Realität.
Kommentar dazu auf X: "Erste Überlebende berichten aus der Kesselschlacht von Riesa: Eine ganze Generation traumatisiert. 0 Grad und keine Toiletten. Das ist Polizeigewalt." @ ozizzus
Andrey, a Russian entrepreneur living in Brazil who, fearing retaliation, asked that NPR not use his last name, said Telegram has become one of the few places Russians can access independent news about the war. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from us
