Лукашенко жалуется Путину на ЧВК "Вагнер", которые по его словам "угрожают напасть на Польшу". Чего только не придумаешь, чтобы выманить из российского бюджета пару дополнительных миллиарда на офшорные счета своих сыночков.
Лукашенко жалуется Путину на ЧВК "Вагнер", которые по его словам "угрожают напасть на Польшу". Чего только не придумаешь, чтобы выманить из российского бюджета пару дополнительных миллиарда на офшорные счета своих сыночков.
BY Скурлатов live
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." 'Wild West'
from us
