❗️Послу Молдавии в РФ был заявлен решительный протест в связи с продолжающимися недружественными шагами Кишинева, сообщили в МИД.
РФ закроет въезд ряду официальных лиц Молдавии за антироссийские заявления. РФ объявляет в ответ персоной нон грата сотрудника посольства Молдавии, послу страны вручена соответствующая нота.
❗️Послу Молдавии в РФ был заявлен решительный протест в связи с продолжающимися недружественными шагами Кишинева, сообщили в МИД.
РФ закроет въезд ряду официальных лиц Молдавии за антироссийские заявления. РФ объявляет в ответ персоной нон грата сотрудника посольства Молдавии, послу страны вручена соответствующая нота.
BY ТАСС
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. NEWS
from us
