Комікс за мотивами інциденту з "літаючим гном Кебраділласа", якого спостерігали в Пуерто-Ріко 12 липня 1977 року місцевий бізнесмен Адріан Де Ольмос, його сім'я та деякі сусіди
Комікс за мотивами інциденту з "літаючим гном Кебраділласа", якого спостерігали в Пуерто-Ріко 12 липня 1977 року місцевий бізнесмен Адріан Де Ольмос, його сім'я та деякі сусіди
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? "This time we received the coordinates of enemy vehicles marked 'V' in Kyiv region," it added. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market.
from us