Силовикам пришлось с помощью кувалды открыть дверь в элитный БДСМ-салон в Екатеринбурге.
В июле Ural Mash писал, что в бордель "Империя" рядом с ЖК "Тихвин" заглянули полицейские и общественники. После возбудили дело за возможную организацию оказания интимных услуг.
Но салон продолжил творить темные делишки. Правоохранители снова нагрянули в "Империю" и поймали с поличным одну из девчат — за это завели административку.
Силовикам пришлось с помощью кувалды открыть дверь в элитный БДСМ-салон в Екатеринбурге.
В июле Ural Mash писал, что в бордель "Империя" рядом с ЖК "Тихвин" заглянули полицейские и общественники. После возбудили дело за возможную организацию оказания интимных услуг.
Но салон продолжил творить темные делишки. Правоохранители снова нагрянули в "Империю" и поймали с поличным одну из девчат — за это завели административку.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source." Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from us
