🔴 Evidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfection After Recovery from Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019 OUP 21 November 2020
#Reinfection with a genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 strain may occur in an immunocompetent patient ⚠️shortly after recovery from mild COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection may not confer immunity against a different SARS-CoV-2 strain.
The viral RNA of positive retest was clustered into a subgroup distinct from that of the initial infection, suggesting that there was a reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 with a subtype that was 👉different from that of the primary strain.
On day 15 of hospitalization (25 March 2020), the patient’s symptoms had nearly disappeared. The patient tested negative via PCR on 26 and 27 March and was discharged home on 30 March. 🚨Six days after discharge (5 April 2020) the patient reported aggravation of cough combined with sputum. A day later, the upper respiratory specimens retested positive. 🟣 دربارۀ کووید-۱۹: 🆘@nouritazeh
🔴 Evidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfection After Recovery from Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019 OUP 21 November 2020
#Reinfection with a genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 strain may occur in an immunocompetent patient ⚠️shortly after recovery from mild COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection may not confer immunity against a different SARS-CoV-2 strain.
The viral RNA of positive retest was clustered into a subgroup distinct from that of the initial infection, suggesting that there was a reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 with a subtype that was 👉different from that of the primary strain.
On day 15 of hospitalization (25 March 2020), the patient’s symptoms had nearly disappeared. The patient tested negative via PCR on 26 and 27 March and was discharged home on 30 March. 🚨Six days after discharge (5 April 2020) the patient reported aggravation of cough combined with sputum. A day later, the upper respiratory specimens retested positive. 🟣 دربارۀ کووید-۱۹: 🆘@nouritazeh
BY پیشگیری از همهگیری بیماریهای واگیردار
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. During the operations, Sebi officials seized various records and documents, including 34 mobile phones, six laptops, four desktops, four tablets, two hard drive disks and one pen drive from the custody of these persons. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
from us
