Почему бы так же легко и просто, как это делается в случае с иноагентством, не ввести институт диаспоральных агентов? Состоит человек на финансировании диаспоры, действует в интересах оной. Вот тебе статус. Вылезает такой на бочку: "Родина 666 национальностей! Бытовой! Не допустим!", а за его ФИО - фраза: "*признан диаспоральным агентом на территории РФ". Или "полковнику _название спецслужбы_, руководителю _здесь районное отделение спецслужбы_ присвоен статус диаспорального агента". И посмотреть. С иноагентами же так много интересного узнали!
Почему бы так же легко и просто, как это делается в случае с иноагентством, не ввести институт диаспоральных агентов? Состоит человек на финансировании диаспоры, действует в интересах оной. Вот тебе статус. Вылезает такой на бочку: "Родина 666 национальностей! Бытовой! Не допустим!", а за его ФИО - фраза: "*признан диаспоральным агентом на территории РФ". Или "полковнику _название спецслужбы_, руководителю _здесь районное отделение спецслужбы_ присвоен статус диаспорального агента". И посмотреть. С иноагентами же так много интересного узнали!
BY Veron_rus
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram was co-founded by Pavel and Nikolai Durov, the brothers who had previously created VKontakte. VK is Russia’s equivalent of Facebook, a social network used for public and private messaging, audio and video sharing as well as online gaming. In January, SimpleWeb reported that VK was Russia’s fourth most-visited website, after Yandex, YouTube and Google’s Russian-language homepage. In 2016, Forbes’ Michael Solomon described Pavel Durov (pictured, below) as the “Mark Zuckerberg of Russia.” At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from us
