Фейковый ТГ Президента России (и несколько его клонов) за пару дней набрал около 70 k подписчиков И если даже вычесть какое-то количество ботов, то число альтернативно одаренных людей в телеге все равно впечатляет. И - да - одно из первых, что сделал «президент» в своем канале (с грамматическими ошибками) отрекламировал блогера Подоляку Выводы делайте сами И думайте.
Фейковый ТГ Президента России (и несколько его клонов) за пару дней набрал около 70 k подписчиков И если даже вычесть какое-то количество ботов, то число альтернативно одаренных людей в телеге все равно впечатляет. И - да - одно из первых, что сделал «президент» в своем канале (с грамматическими ошибками) отрекламировал блогера Подоляку Выводы делайте сами И думайте.
Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Also in the latest update is the ability for users to create a unique @username from the Settings page, providing others with an easy way to contact them via Search or their t.me/username link without sharing their phone number. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
